<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Muni To Speed Up Buses</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bikeblogs.org/sf/2009/01/05/muni-to-speed-up-buses/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bikeblogs.org/sf/2009/01/05/muni-to-speed-up-buses/</link>
	<description>Biking in the Bay</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 14:57:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://bikeblogs.org/sf/2009/01/05/muni-to-speed-up-buses/#comment-3468</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 19:40:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bikeblogs.org/sf/?p=890#comment-3468</guid>
		<description>Except that rail costs so much more than BRT or rapid buses.  How much was the 3rd St. LRT - $250 m  .   And the service is not better than the 15 bus it replaced.

The 72R works well here in the East Bay.  Cost was low, benefit (increased ridership) high.  $7 million for a 20  mile line.

BRT or rapid buses can work with bike lanes, etc.  Blanket statements that buses are bad and rail is good don't hold water.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Except that rail costs so much more than BRT or rapid buses.  How much was the 3rd St. LRT - $250 m  .   And the service is not better than the 15 bus it replaced.</p>
<p>The 72R works well here in the East Bay.  Cost was low, benefit (increased ridership) high.  $7 million for a 20  mile line.</p>
<p>BRT or rapid buses can work with bike lanes, etc.  Blanket statements that buses are bad and rail is good don&#8217;t hold water.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

