<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Raise The Gas Tax 1% Year After Year For 25 Years</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bikeblogs.org/sf/2008/11/26/raise-the-gas-tax-1-year-after-year-for-25-years/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bikeblogs.org/sf/2008/11/26/raise-the-gas-tax-1-year-after-year-for-25-years/</link>
	<description>Biking in the Bay</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 11:21:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Hembrow</title>
		<link>http://bikeblogs.org/sf/2008/11/26/raise-the-gas-tax-1-year-after-year-for-25-years/#comment-2473</link>
		<dc:creator>David Hembrow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 17:27:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bikeblogs.org/sf/?p=503#comment-2473</guid>
		<description>From 1993 to 2000, the UK had a "fuel price escalator" which was much the same idea as you're putting forward.

After a few years there was a protest and it failed: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuel_Price_Escalator

Overlapping with this from 1996, the UK also had "national cycling strategy" which had the aim of quadrupling the number of cycling trips by 2012. This was abandoned a few years ago after cycle usage in the UK had dropped rather than risen.

The problem, as ever, is that it's just hot air. If a useful percentage of what was raised from the escalator had been put into genuinely good cycling infrastructure it may have made a difference.

It might also have lead to the public being more accepting of higher fuel prices than if they believed they had no choice but to drive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From 1993 to 2000, the UK had a &#8220;fuel price escalator&#8221; which was much the same idea as you&#8217;re putting forward.</p>
<p>After a few years there was a protest and it failed: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuel_Price_Escalator" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuel_Price_Escalator</a></p>
<p>Overlapping with this from 1996, the UK also had &#8220;national cycling strategy&#8221; which had the aim of quadrupling the number of cycling trips by 2012. This was abandoned a few years ago after cycle usage in the UK had dropped rather than risen.</p>
<p>The problem, as ever, is that it&#8217;s just hot air. If a useful percentage of what was raised from the escalator had been put into genuinely good cycling infrastructure it may have made a difference.</p>
<p>It might also have lead to the public being more accepting of higher fuel prices than if they believed they had no choice but to drive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

